Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
hummm, does this mean the ejb-jar task will be depricated in
the near furure?

No, <serverdeploy> and <ejbjar> are two separate beasts. <ejbjar> is not going away. <serverdeploy> is for deploying, which is what you said you created two tasks for.


as i understood, the serverdeploy tool does not package
archives ...

am i wrong with that?

You're right. All I was getting at was that the two start/stop tasks you created - they should fit into <serverdeploy> to be acceptable to the Ant codebase.


        Erik



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to