On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I prefer to not overload the datatypes anymore. I agree in general, but in this case we wouldn't overload the data type but push down functionality from an attribute to a nested element - this also gives us the choice of having multiple include/exclude files for a single patternset. Stefan
- Optional excludesfile in javac? Mark Womack
- Re: Optional excludesfile in javac? Stefan Bodewig
- RE: Optional excludesfile in javac? Mark Womack
- Re: Optional excludesfile in javac? Stefan Bodewig
- Re: Optional excludesfile in javac? Peter Donald
- RE: Optional excludesfile in javac? Stefan Bodewig
- RE: Optional excludesfile in javac? Mark Womack