Despite what was said in the meeting, It looks like I'm not the only one then
thinking that we should do the human verification ...
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-boun...@ripe.net> en nombre de Marco Schmidt
<mschm...@ripe.net>
Fecha: viernes, 19 de enero de 2018, 13:09
Para: <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular
abuse-c Validation)
Dear Jordi,
Thank you for your question.
On 2018-01-18 19:44:51 CET, Jordi Palet Martinez wrote:
> HOWEVER, I’ve a question regarding the impact analysis, and specially
this sentence:
>
> “To increase efficiency, this process will use an automated solution that
will allow the validation of “abuse-mailbox:” attributes without sending an
email. No action will be needed by resource holders that have configured their
“abuse-mailbox:” attribute correctly.”
>
> Reading the policy proposal, how the NCC concludes that it should be
“without sending an email”?
>
During the initial discussion phase and also during the Anti-Abuse WG
session at RIPE 75, several people stated that forcing providers to
reply to the RIPE NCC doesn't ensure that they will respond to
actual abuse reports. At the same time, such a policy requirement would
create additional workload to all providers. For these reasons, the
proposers decided to remove such a requirement in v2.0 of their proposal.
The RIPE NCC will focus on the technical accuracy of abuse contact
emails. These checks can be done without the need to send an email.
Validating that an abuse mailbox attribute is correctly configured
ensures that abuse reports can reach their destination.
The way that abuse reports are handled by the receiving party is
usually defined by the internal procedures of the providers and not by RIPE
Policies.
I hope this clarifies.
Kind regards,
Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
