Hi Gert, > Now, I do share the wish to "do something!!" against BGP hijacking. > > So, maybe a more workable way forward would be to change this into a BCP > ("the RIPE anti-abuse community states with full backing from the RIPE > community that BGP hijacking, as defined in <reference>, is considered > unwanted behaviour") - and *then* use that on a commercial/peering basis > among transit ISPs to strengthen the message "we want *you* to filter > your customer BGP sessions, because that's the proper way to run a network!".
+1 Cheers, Sander
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP