On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:17:07 +0000 Brian Nisbet <brian.nis...@heanet.ie> wrote: > Sascha, all, > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sascha Luck [ml] <a...@c4inet.net> > > Sent: Monday 25 March 2019 12:24 > > I therefore argue that it is maybe time to have a discussion on > > what exactly RIPE and the NCC should be and what, if any, limits on > > their administrative power there should be. > > I hope, though, that everyone can at least agree that *this* is > > *not* the forum for that discussion. > > To confirm, the Anti-Abuse WG is absolutely not the right forum for > that discussion. >
that administrative authority exists, is also not a "discussion" thing, it is a "it already exists" thing. in fact, even on this mailing list (also a resource), there exists rules and there exists administrative authority to remove people from this list. and, people are indeed blocked/banned/removed from this mailing list. So, just to be quite clear: Administrative authority exists and is used regularly and applied to all sorts of resources, all the time. Also, imo, the boundaries of administrative authority as it applies to RIPE is also more of a "legal" thing than a "discussion" thing. Andre
