Hi Leo
El 14/1/20 0:11, "Leo Vegoda" <l...@vegoda.org> escribió:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:50 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg
<anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
[...]
> I will love to have in the policy that they must be investigated and
acted upon, but what I heard from the inputs in previous versions is that
having that in policy is too much and no way to reach consensus …
I don't understand the value of requiring organizations who do not
intend to investigate abuse reports to spend resources publishing an
address from which they can acknowledge the reports - only to then
delete those reports without doing anything.
This is not handled by this proposal. The existing policy already mandates that:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2017-02
It creates hope for reporters and wastes the RIPE NCC's and the
reporters' resources by forcing unwilling organizations to spend
cycles on unproductive activity.
Why not give networks two options?
1. Publish a reliable method for people to submit abuse reports - and act
on it
2. Publish a statement to the effect that the network operator does
not act on abuse reports
This would save lots of wasted effort and give everyone more reliable
information about the proportion of networks/operators who will and
won't act on abuse reports.
Even if I think that the operators MUST process abuse cases, if the community
thinks otherwise, I'm happy to support those two options in the proposal. For
example, an autoresponder in the abuse-c mailbox for those that don't intend to
process the abuse cases to option 2 above?
There might be some value in having the RIPE NCC cooperate with
networks who want help checking that their abuse-c is working. But
this proposal seems to move the RIPE NCC from the role of a helpful
coordinator towards that of an investigator and judge.
No, I don't think so, but I'm happy to modify the text if it looks like that.
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
