Re: [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg]

El 16/1/20 15:25, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Ronald F. Guilmette" 
<anti-abuse-wg-boun...@ripe.net en nombre de r...@tristatelogic.com> escribió:

    In message <fe63ed86-8823-4f7d-81bd-dd08aa130...@consulintel.es>, 
    JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
    
    >I'm sure that this is the same in every EU country. Can we agree on that?
    
    Quite certainly not!  Doing so would break ALL established precedent!
 

I used EU on purpose here. I didn't want to say every RIPE NCC country.

I really think the electricity case I've described works that way in EU 
countries. Anyone believes not?

Any lawyer in the list can provides hints why yes or why not?
   
    When was the last time this working group agreed on *anything*?
    
    
    Regards,
    rfg
    
    
    P.S.  And anyway, as I myself have just been reminded, RIPE != EU.
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.