Thank you for your followup. I am curious, do you consider the browsers as having a bug in that the images referenced by the URL that are referenced as reletive links can not be found, apprently due to how the browser interprets the URL? In other words, the browsers present different results depending upon if the trailing slash is included or not.
If you believe that it is a bug, I will try to submit bug reports to each of the browser creators, if you agree with the assertion. Thanks - Marc ---- In reference to: Date: 27 Aug 1999 17:28:03 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: apache-bugdb@apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: general/4911: URLS like "http://www.apache.org/index.html/"; should return a NOT FOUND, but don't. [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need] [to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line and make sure the] [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ] [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ] ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ] [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ] ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ] [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ] [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ] [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: URLS like "http://www.apache.org/index.html/"; should return a NOT FOUND, but don't. Comment-Added-By: coar Comment-Added-When: Fri Aug 27 10:27:56 PDT 1999 Comment-Added: No, the current behaviour is exactly correct. The trailing slash is part of the PATH_INFO. Class-Changed-From-To: sw-bug-mistaken Class-Changed-By: coar Class-Changed-When: Fri Aug 27 10:27:56 PDT 1999
