Marc Evans wrote: > > Thank you for your followup. I am curious, do you consider the > browsers as having a bug in that the images referenced by the URL > that are referenced as reletive links can not be found, apprently > due to how the browser interprets the URL? In other words, the > browsers present different results depending upon if the trailing > slash is included or not.
An interesting point. But no, I don't think that's a bug -- the browsers are behaving correctly. They have no way of knowing where the path-info begins. If a resource is capable of accepting path-info, it really should have the responsibility of correctly coding internal relative references so they appear as absolute to the client, and avoid this ambiguity. Do you have specific cases on the Apache site where this is done? Because they should be fixed if so.. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar <http://Web.Golux.Com/coar/> Apache Software Foundation <http://www.apache.org/> "Apache Server for Dummies" <http://ASFD.MeepZor.Com/>
