brian       98/03/30 00:31:19

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  Clear, cold, a perfect night to catch up on email and vote here and there.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.244     +12 -6     apache-1.3/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.243
  retrieving revision 1.244
  diff -u -r1.243 -r1.244
  --- STATUS    1998/03/30 04:21:37     1.243
  +++ STATUS    1998/03/30 08:31:18     1.244
  @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
         or not, and if not, what changes are needed to make it right.
   
         Approve guidelines as written:
  -         +1: Roy, Dean, Paul, Jim, Martin, Ralf, Randy
  +         +1: Roy, Dean, Paul, Jim, Martin, Ralf, Randy, Brian
            +0:
            -1:
   
  @@ -135,6 +135,11 @@
         nature of usage of the name "Apache" in derived products
        Status: Ken +1, Paul +1, Ben +1, Jim +1, Randy +1, Roy +1,
                Chuck +1, MarkC +1, Ralf +1, Sameer +1, Martin +1, Dean +1
  +             Brian +1
  +
  +    * Dean's patch to speed up os_escape_path 
  +     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  +     Status: Brian +1
   
   In progress:
   
  @@ -203,6 +208,11 @@
        maintainer friendly, because we aren't, and won't be,
        the only one's to maintain this.
   
  +        Brian - can we compromise by using the "HIDE" system to
  +        expand out *all* prefixes in the cpp?  This would still affect
  +        people during debugging, but would avoid the CTS-inducing
  +        effect of typing "apapi" over and over.
  +
       * Paul would like to see a 'gdbm' option because he uses
         it a lot. Dean notes that 'gdbm' include 'db' support
         so we need to watch the library ordering.
  @@ -241,10 +251,6 @@
       * Marc's socket options like source routing (kill them?)
        Marc, Dean, Martin say Yes
   
  -    * Marc's [BUG] include virtual and SCRIPT_NAME w/path_info
  -     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  -     Dean says: please put this in the bugdb
  -
       * Ken's PR#1053: an error when accessing a negotiated document
         explicitly names the variant selected.  Should it do so, or should
         the base input name be referenced?
  @@ -290,7 +296,7 @@
        Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3b6, and labelled "release
            candidate on unix, beta on NT".  The release after that will be
            called 1.3.0 "stable on unix, beta on NT".
  -         +1: Jim, Ralf, Randy
  +         +1: Jim, Ralf, Randy, Brian
            +0: Dean
   
               Notes:
  
  
  

Reply via email to