martin 98/04/01 06:03:06
Modified: . STATUS Log: Vote - and note fix of proxy_util to accept and pass URL's in the format http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Revision Changes Path 1.252 +5 -4 apache-1.3/STATUS Index: STATUS =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v retrieving revision 1.251 retrieving revision 1.252 diff -u -u -r1.251 -r1.252 --- STATUS 1998/04/01 11:28:33 1.251 +++ STATUS 1998/04/01 14:03:05 1.252 @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ * Ken's reworking of the Apache LICENSE * Ralf's APache eXtenSion for easy "off-source" extending Apache via DSO * Ralf's APACI --without-support option + * Martin's fix accept (and pass) http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] proxy requests Available Patches: @@ -177,7 +178,7 @@ currently os_xxx, migrate to ap_xxx: Brian Public API functions (e.g., palloc) - apapi_xxx: +1: Ken, Brian, Ralf, Martin, Paul, Jim + apapi_xxx: +1: Ken, Brian, Ralf, Paul, Jim appublic_xxx: appub_xxx: @@ -189,7 +190,7 @@ apint_xxx: +1: Ralf (int = internal) Alternate proposal: - Everything should be ap_: +1 Dean, Randy, Roy + Everything should be ap_: +1 Dean, Randy, Roy, Martin Why? Because it's far easier to type, and damn it, I type these things far too much. Just using apapi_ for the few hours I did while writing apapi_vformatter is @@ -232,7 +233,7 @@ * Maybe a http_paths.h file? See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Dean +1, Brian +1, Paul +1, Ralf +1 + +1: Dean, Brian, Paul, Ralf, Martin * Release builds: Should we provide Configuration or not? Should we 'make all suexec' in src/support? @@ -297,7 +298,7 @@ Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3b6, and labelled "release candidate on unix, beta on NT". The release after that will be called 1.3.0 "stable on unix, beta on NT". - +1: Jim, Ralf, Randy, Brian + +1: Jim, Ralf, Randy, Brian, Martin +0: Dean Notes:
