rse         99/06/25 01:12:19

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  No more comment...
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.723     +19 -1     apache-1.3/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.722
  retrieving revision 1.723
  diff -u -r1.722 -r1.723
  --- STATUS    1999/06/24 16:38:31     1.722
  +++ STATUS    1999/06/25 08:12:18     1.723
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
     1.3 STATUS:
  -  Last modified at [$Date: 1999/06/24 16:38:31 $]
  +  Last modified at [$Date: 1999/06/25 08:12:18 $]
   
   Release:
   
  @@ -114,6 +114,24 @@
                   recompilation), because it's a pure _ADDITION_ to the API and
                   doesn't make anything incompatible. The point b) I still do
                   not sunderstand, sorry. 
  +
  +                * Hmmmm.... now we've to solve another problem for the EAPI
  +                * idea: the existance of KEAPI. That's not my problem any
  +                * longer.  Others have to make decisions now. Additionally 
the
  +                * group as a whole is far away from a point where it's clear
  +                * what should be done in the future and also far away from
  +                * the point where it's fun. 
  +                *
  +                * So I finally withdraw my proposed addition of EAPI for
  +                * 1.3.7/1.4.0 and for 2.0 I've still no strong opinion how it
  +                * should be done.  I'll try to stay out of all this and keep
  +                * being happy to have EAPI myself and don't have to worry
  +                * about all those useless politics and endless ping-pong
  +                * decisions.
  +                *
  +                * IMHO the ASF should really quickly propose the
  +                * revitalization of RST's old ENOTOWN symbolic errno value 
  +                * for use by its developers...       -- RSE
   
       * Brian Havard's patch to remove dependency of mod_auth_dbm on mod_auth.
         (PR#2598)
  
  
  

Reply via email to