Did anyone else test the IPv6 patch ? Preferably
on non solaris / non freebsd ?
Dw.
On 7 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> coar 99/07/07 04:05:16
>
> Modified: . STATUS
> Log:
> Veto EAPI for 1.3.7 (too much confusion and controversy, esp.
> with the KEAPI alternative); defer it until the next release.
> Also note some platforms I can build.
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.724 +8 -30 apache-1.3/STATUS
>
> Index: STATUS
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
> retrieving revision 1.723
> retrieving revision 1.724
> diff -u -r1.723 -r1.724
> --- STATUS 1999/06/25 08:12:18 1.723
> +++ STATUS 1999/07/07 11:05:15 1.724
> @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
> 1.3 STATUS:
> - Last modified at [$Date: 1999/06/25 08:12:18 $]
> + Last modified at [$Date: 1999/07/07 11:05:15 $]
>
> Release:
>
> 1.3.7-dev: current. Ken volunteers to be release manager.
> + Proposed dates: roll on Mon, 26 July 1999, test, and release
> + on Fri, 30 July 1999.
>
> 1.3.6. Tagged and rolled on Mar. 22. Released and announced on 24th.
> 1.3.5: Not released.
> @@ -20,7 +22,7 @@
> Platform Avail. Volunteer
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> alpha-dec-osf3.0 no Sameer Parekh
> - alpha-dec-osf4.0 yes Lars Eilebrecht
> + alpha-dec-osf4.0 yes Lars Eilebrecht, Ken Coar
> armv4l-whatever-linux2 yes Rasmus Lerdorf
> hppa1.1-hp-hpux no Rob Hartill
> i386-slackware-linux(a.out) no Sameer Parekh
> @@ -34,9 +36,10 @@
> i686-pc-freebsd3.1 no Ralf S. Engelschall
> i586-unknown-linux2 yes Ralf S. Engelschall, Lars Eilebrecht
> i686-unknown-linux2 yes Lars Eilebrecht
> + i686-whatever-linux2 yes Ken Coar
> i386-unknown-linux(ELF) no Aram Mirzadeh, Michael Douglass
> i386-unknown-netBSD-1.2.1 N/A Lars Eilebrecht
> - i386-unknown-netBSD-1.3.2 yes Lars Eilebrecht
> + i386-unknown-netBSD-1.3.2 yes Lars Eilebrecht
> i386-unknown-sco3 no Ben Laurie
> i386-unknown-sco5 no Ben Laurie
> i386-sni-svr4 yes Martin Kraemer
> @@ -105,33 +108,8 @@
> Status: Jim +1, Mark +1, Dean +1, BenH +1,
> Randy +1 (please choose name other than "hook")
> Doug +1 on concept (untested), Lars +1 on concept,
> - Martin +1 (untested),
> -
> - Ken: -1 for pre-2.0 if it will: a) force a new release of
> - mod_perl or mod_php in order to maintain compatibility OR
> - b) require a version bump to 1.4.0 and a beta cycle
> - Ralf: It doesn't force a new release of any module (just a
> - recompilation), because it's a pure _ADDITION_ to the API
> and
> - doesn't make anything incompatible. The point b) I still do
> - not sunderstand, sorry.
> -
> - * Hmmmm.... now we've to solve another problem for the EAPI
> - * idea: the existance of KEAPI. That's not my problem any
> - * longer. Others have to make decisions now. Additionally
> the
> - * group as a whole is far away from a point where it's
> clear
> - * what should be done in the future and also far away from
> - * the point where it's fun.
> - *
> - * So I finally withdraw my proposed addition of EAPI for
> - * 1.3.7/1.4.0 and for 2.0 I've still no strong opinion how
> it
> - * should be done. I'll try to stay out of all this and
> keep
> - * being happy to have EAPI myself and don't have to worry
> - * about all those useless politics and endless ping-pong
> - * decisions.
> - *
> - * IMHO the ASF should really quickly propose the
> - * revitalization of RST's old ENOTOWN symbolic errno value
> - * for use by its developers... -- RSE
> + Martin +1 (untested), Ken -1 for 1.3.7 (too controversial,
> + esp. w/KEAPI offered as well)
>
> * Brian Havard's patch to remove dependency of mod_auth_dbm on
> mod_auth.
> (PR#2598)
>
>
>
>
