On 8 February 2011 21:56, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 February 2011 21:30, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Gema Ramírez-Sánchez <[email protected]> writes: >>> I like the idea in general, how should we go ahead? making a proposal >>> and submitting it to the PMC? >> >> Agreed. I like the idea too. Having pairs that are a little testvoc away >> from release in the same place as pairs that have 20 lines of bidix is >> both confusing and demotivating. >> > > Ok, so unless there are any objections, I'll put it to the PMC. >
I put the proposals on the wiki: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC_Proposals/Repository_reorganisation http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC_Proposals/Pre-releases Comments are welcome, particularly as 1) This is a new process 2) It seems as though both proposals will need to be revised to move forward. -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
