Ilnar, what language pair is this?
Please give us some info so we can reproduce the problem
Sendt fra min Android
Den 23/02/2013 00.24 skrev "Mikel Artetxe" <[email protected]>:
> Ilnar, going to View->Options and checking "Use external processing"
> should solve your problem. For the full explanation, see below.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Jacob Nordfalk <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Ilnar,
>>
>> 2013/2/20 Ilnar Salimzyan <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Dear Apertiumers,
>>>
>>> Apertium-viewer crashes immediately after the start. I get this output:
>>>
>>> selimcan@achilles:~$ javaws
>>>
>>> https://apertium.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/apertium/builds/apertium-viewer/launch.jnlp
>>> startup txt = Sample text
>>> newTxt = Sample text
>>> newTxt = ^Sample/*Sample$ ^text/*text$
>>> newTxt = ^Sample/*Sample$ ^text/*text$
>>> newTxt = ^*Sample$ ^*text$
>>> newTxt = ^*Sample$ ^*text$
>>> newTxt = ^*Sample$ ^*text$
>>> newTxt = ^*Sample$ ^*text$
>>> getopt.invalid
>>> Unregognized parameter: ?
>>> LTProc3.2j: process a stream with a letter transducer
>>> USAGE: LTProc [-c] [-a|-g|-n|-d|-b|-p|-s|-t] fst_file [input_file
>>> [output_file]]
>>> Options:
>>> -a: morphological analysis (default behavior)
>>>
>>> It looks like lttoolbox-java gives an error, so I installed the latest
>>> version of it from svn, but got the same result.
>>>
>>
> apertium-viewer doesn't use your local installation of lttoolbox-java, so
> updating it has no practical effect. In fact, the only requirement to run
> apertium-viewer is java.
>
>
>>
>> This is very strange. It seems lttoolbox-java is used?
>> Apertium-viewer was made to use the C++ version when running locally
>> installed pairs, and the Java version when running online.
>>
>
> Nope. The default behaviour since version 2.0 is to use lttoolbox-java for
> both local and online pairs, but the C++ version can still be enabled in
> the settings as I've described above (but it only works for local pairs).
> The main motivation for this design is performance, since there is no
> noticeable lag with lttoolbox-java unlike with the C++ version. If the
> language pair in question requires to run some external program,
> lttoolbox-java can deal with it. It seems that the problem here is that
> lttoolbox-java doesn't support some parameter for LTProc that the C++
> version does, so it simply crashes. Perhaps it should try to invoke the
> external program in these cases as well?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
> _______________________________________________
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
