2017-07-18, Francis Tyers sanoi:
> El 2017-07-18 14:44, Marc Riera Irigoyen escribió:
> > Hello! I'm working on apertium-eng-cat and I've been having some
> > issues with genitives. Currently, many noun paradigms in
> > apertium-eng (mostly irregular nouns) have a <gen> form with the
> > genitive. Not all nouns have it, so apertium-eng also includes a
> > specific lemma for the regular genitive ('s) to add the <gen> tag
> > in the analysis.
> >
> > However, when using apertium-eng for generation, it is impossible to
> > know in advance whether or not a lemma has the genitive form, so
> > generation for lemmas without the <gen> form is broken.
> >
> > I'm considering adding a <gen> form to all the affected paradigms to
> > fix this issue. Any objections?
>
> Are there other pairs relying on apertium-eng ? Would this break
> them ?
I’ve genitives and apertium-eng set up for e.g. fin-eng, but I’m ok with
whichever solution, if you can post a bidix formula for that once
you’ve updated the eng.
--
Flammie, computer scientist bachelor + linguist master = computational
linguist doctor, free software Finnish localiser,
and more! <http://www.iki.fi/flammie/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
