The only problem we have now is segmentation fault for pre-compiled
binaries. If the language pair is building fine I don't think any
inconsistencies will arise because of the addition of weights.
[image: Mailtrack]
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;>
Sender
notified by
Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;>
08/07/18,
12:30:28 PM
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:01 AM Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Missatge de Francis Tyers <fty...@prompsit.com> del dia dt., 7 d’ag. 2018
> a les 0:13:
>
>>
>> I'd say that's feasible as it will have changed the topology of some
>> transducers. Although in principle if the tagger is doing its job
>> as expected, that shouldn't happen ... e.g. it should only happen if
>> there is ambiguity left.
>>
>>
> Is there any way to check if there is ambiguity left? Something like
> printing the distinct probabilities of the different analysis?
>
> I've been looking through the code, but I can't see any way of properly
> debugging this. Ideas?
>
>
> --
> < Xavi Ivars >
> < http://xavi.ivars.me >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
