El 2019-03-13 12:42, Tino Didriksen escribió:
Unfortunately, Apertium licensing is messy. Most things are under
GPLv2+, some things are GPLv3+, and a few are CC-BY-SA.
- apertium-eng is GPLv3+
- apertium-cat is GPLv2+ (note 2)
- apertium-eng-cat is GPLv3+
So any derivative of those would combine to GPLv3+, which you rightly
identify as only being one-way import compatible with CC-BY-SA. You
can try to get all significant authors of those packages to agree on
CC-BY-SA.
I'm happy to go with any of the above.
Fran
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
