ср, 13 мар. 2019 г. в 08:44, Tino Didriksen <tino.didrik...@gmail.com>:
> Unfortunately, Apertium licensing is messy. Most things are under GPLv2+, > some things are GPLv3+, and a few are CC-BY-SA. > > - apertium-eng is GPLv3+ > - apertium-cat is GPLv2+ (note 2) > - apertium-eng-cat is GPLv3+ > > So any derivative of those would combine to GPLv3+, which you rightly > identify as only being one-way import compatible with CC-BY-SA. You can try > to get all significant authors of those packages to agree on CC-BY-SA. > > -- Tino Didriksen > > > By "agree on CC-BY-SA", I assume you mean "agree to dual-license the code as CC-BY-SA in addition to GPLv3+"? -- Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
