Hi,
I have prepared the structure of the paper.  it is just start,  here the
link:

https://www.overleaf.com/8679142877hkvxvhpsyvyz

If you agree with this then I will keep work on, and anyone need to
contribute  to edit or add stuff  can reach the content.

Sevilay



On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 6:11 PM Sevilay Bayatlı <sevilaybaya...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 1- If the paper present translating between less-resources closely related
> languages then we have to provide proof that MT between related languages
> is easier for all systems (and provide citations) and so the current
> approach tests the new system on closely related languages.
>
> 2- Regarding of comparing apertium with corpus based systems, as you know
> for that we have to use some parallel data for training and testing
> systems. Previously I sued data form OPUS but their data has a lot of
> problems such as more than half of sentences were repeated and most of
> target sentence was unrelated to the source sentence..etc. So what I did I
> trained the systems with OPUS and tested it with my test data. I did the
> evaluation by comparing it with post-edited my test data. However the
> reviewers complain for bais and say it is not fair. so I want to know the
> others how they did it. And also if there is recently published papers
> about comparing NMT and apertium could you give us the link.
>
> 3- I think it will be great idea "something about all the technological
> improvements" as Flammie pointed out. We may do something like that section
> for each module with diagram explain its process by applying it for one
> pair.
>
> Sevilay
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:39 PM Juan Pablo <jpm...@unizar.es> wrote:
>
>> Same here!
>> I think submitting a paper to this Special Issue it is a great idea, as
>> coverage for low-resource languages is one of the distinctive traits of
>> Apertium as well as of this community.
>> If there is something I can contribute, I would be happy to collaborate
>> in it (no need to be in the authors' list). Please, keep me informed.
>> Best,
>> Juan Pablo
>> On 23/10/2019 13:36, Hèctor Alòs i Font wrote:
>>
>> Missatge de Tommi A Pirinen <tommi.antero.piri...@uni-hamburg.de> del
>> dia dc., 23 d’oct. 2019 a les 14:16:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:57:28PM +0300, Sevilay Bayatlı wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> > its my pleasure to participate too, if you want I can prepare the
>>> overleaf
>>> > and send it to you. But first lets discuss here the content of the
>>> paper.
>>>
>>> Ok. I have two things in mind that could be included:
>>>
>>> * some kind of description of all low-resource languages done in past 10
>>>   years, most of these have publications to cite etc.
>>> * something about all the technological improvements, all the gsoc
>>>   stuffs that's been used now, etc.
>>>
>>> Some of the publications e.g. in loresmt this year also have really nice
>>> comparison between apertium and state-of-the-art NMT that should be
>>> replicated in this article.
>>>
>>>
>> If the article deals in a relevant way with Apertium and low-ressource
>> languages in recent years, I would be happy to collaborate in it. If it's
>> about technical issues, I can't contribute anything of interest.
>>
>> Hèctor
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apertium-stuff mailing 
>> listApertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to