It's been a week since last comment on the PR. Everyone is happy with how the new Bylaws look now?
If you haven't already, please take the time to read through the current wording and comments. -- Tino Didriksen On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 22:14, Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> wrote: > I'm proposing overhauling the Apertium Bylaws, and after some fixes and > refinements by the PMC, it's time to get everyone's input. > > PR with comments: https://github.com/apertium/organisation/pull/13 > > Current bylaws: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Bylaws > > Proposed bylaws: > https://github.com/apertium/organisation/blob/overhaul/Bylaws.md > Proposed CLA: > https://github.com/apertium/organisation/blob/overhaul/CLA-optional.md > > Diff: https://github.com/apertium/organisation/pull/13/files > > The rationale is laid out in the top PR comment. There are 3 underlying > tenets: > - Codify our de facto behavior into de jure language. > - Ensure all forms of contributions can result in voting rights. > - Set up for an eventual Apertium legal entity. > > Please read the whole thing, and give feedback on the PR so that it is > kept in one place. > > -- Tino Didriksen > >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
