The vote will be to confirm if this decision is fine. The same as votes for an election (anyone in the census can vote). If there are significant no votes, or really any no votes we can have a discussion about the next step. If the voting is unanimous then we have a mandate from the assembly of committers, which would make the election legit.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022, 14:21 Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm OK with both approaches. If we want people voting, that's fine for me. > > But also, voting for just to confirm (or also push back?) the only group > of people that volunteered seems a bit useless. > > Maybe if someone outside the PMC gave their opinion, voting would make > more sense. But so far, it's been only the ones in the PMC (+ Sushain + > Daniel), everyone agreeing. > > > -- > Xavi Ivars > < http://xavi.ivars.me > > > El dc., 27 d’abr. 2022, 10:43, Tanmai Khanna <khanna.tan...@gmail.com> va > escriure: > >> If the rest of the PMC is okay with it, I guess that's what we'll do. I >> still propose a vote so that we can have it on the record that the assembly >> of committers is okay with this decision. I get that by not replying >> there's an assumed consent but it really seems iffy when there's an >> election involved. >> >> It shouldn't take too long. Just a thought :) >> >> Tanmai >> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022, 14:05 Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> >> wrote: >> >>> There is precedence even in legislative bodies: >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unanimous_consent >>> >>> We've given ample time and updates, and we have a possible outcome that >>> can be achieved by unanimous consent. I say we take it and get on with the >>> business of forming the Foundation, which the (new) PMC can delegate the >>> legwork of to anyone. >>> >>> -- Tino Didriksen >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 at 17:41, Tanmai Khanna <khanna.tan...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I get the sentiment but to be honest, not holding elections at all does >>>> dent credibility a little. Tino offered to stand for President, and so did >>>> Francis. Maybe we should have a vote, secure a mandate and then move on. >>>> >>>> That way it'll be clear to everyone that the leader is elected and not >>>> just selected unopposed. >>>> >>>> What do you guys think? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022, 19:54 Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> G'day everyone, >>>>> >>>>> It's been a week, and we have 7 candidates for PMC and 2 for >>>>> President: https://github.com/apertium/elections >>>>> >>>>> - PMC: Francis M. Tyers, Jonathan N. Washington, Kevin Brubeck >>>>> Unhammer, Mikel L. Forcada, Tanmai Khanna, Tino Didriksen, Xavi Ivars >>>>> >>>>> - President: Francis, Tino >>>>> >>>>> Given that exactly 7 for PMC would avoid the need for an election, I'm >>>>> happy to forego the whole thing and let Francis continue in the role of >>>>> President. >>>>> >>>>> So, I propose that if this is still the status by end-of-day UTC >>>>> tomorrow (2022-04-27 23:59:59 UTC, ~34 hours from now), then we don't hold >>>>> the election and simply replace Sushain K. Cherivirala with Kevin Brubeck >>>>> Unhammer. CC'ed Sushain directly. >>>>> >>>>> -- Tino Didriksen >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
