There were tests on the wiki for isl-eng of unknown age and provenance
that I copied into -regtest when I was setting that up in general. For
es-ro, I pulled a handful of random forms from the generator. The fact
that none of them pass now indicates that something has definitely
changed since then.
Daniel
On 9/3/26 07:13, Jonathan Washington wrote:
The tests in isl-eng are 5 years old, but the language code is 12
years old, so it's probably not actually detecting regressions. The
fact that 0 tests pass probably either means the tests aren't set up
right, or they're bad regression tests. Similar holds true for es-ro.
It is possible that changes in dependencies (especially -eng and -spa)
could be the source of these issues, but I have my doubts. If I end
up with a little free time in the next couple days (hah!) I might
investigate a bit.
--
Jonathan
On Thu, Sep 3, 2026, 04:59 Tino Didriksen <[email protected]> wrote:
isl-eng and es-ro have failed tests for years:
- https://github.com/apertium/apertium-isl-eng/issues/3
- https://github.com/apertium/apertium-es-ro/issues/3
Debian is now giving them a month, or face removal:
https://bugs.debian.org/1146508 & https://bugs.debian.org/1146509
-- Tino Didriksen
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
