Whoops, I accidentally sent an older 32x32 version. I've attached the 64x64 version with some slight adjustments to the size of the 'A's, inner shield and height of the shadow on the leg of the white 'A'. This kind of logo isn't really suitable for icon resolutions smaller than 32x32, so I could make an alternative logo specifically for 22x22 and 16x16.
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:41 PM, John Johansen <john.johan...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 05/22/2018 12:21 AM, Noah Davis wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm working on icons for openSUSE's YaST Control Center and I realized >> AppArmor needed a unique and attractive way to identify it. I have >> attached the logo I came up with. Constructive feedback is >> appreciated. >> > > Hi Noah, > > nice, thanks > > so I do have a few comments > - at smaller sizes it gets difficult to identify the 'A's > > I messed around in gimp a little and here are some suggestions based on > things I tried, feel free to ignore > - darkening the colour does increase the contrast and helps with the white A > but doesn't help the coloured A, I think because it has less contrast to the > shadow > - extending the none shared legs a little (they can extend into the border) > does help with being able recognize the 'A's when the logo is small > - providing a dark outline (I used the outline color) does help with the 'A's > visibility > > of course I understand some of these may affect the logo in adverse ways when > you are looking at a larger version. > > > the other question would be around licensing, if you want it to be used in > the upstream project (and not just yast) the license will need to be > compatible, and open to sharing.
-- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
