While we're speaking of amusing correlations, check out this one.  Perhaps 
organic food also causes autism? :)



http://geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/01/05/will-my-child-be-born-autistic-if-i-eat-gmos-a-scientists-view/
 
<http://geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/01/05/will-my-child-be-born-autistic-if-i-eat-gmos-a-scientists-view/>

Randall Steffens II
Weimar College
Weimar, California


> On Feb 27, 2015, at 5:16 AM, Ginda Fisher <l...@ginda.us 
> <mailto:l...@ginda.us>> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Feb 26, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Jon Clements wrote:
>> ...
>> 6.) What ever happened to BST/BGH push-back and labeling? Ginda, I will let 
>> you look that one up.
>> ...
>> Jon
> 
> I don't need to look that one up, because I've followed it. The differences 
> between the milk and meat of BST/BGH-treated cows is too small to be 
> conclusively measured (higher levels of this and that, but within the normal 
> range) HOWEVER, the incidence of mastitis and other maladies is significantly 
> higher in cows treated with BST than in untreated cows. So, just as the 
> "roundup ready" gene doesn't affect how your body interacts with food, but 
> the greater residue of roundup might be a concern, the hormonal changes in 
> the milk are probably unimportant, but you are probably exposed to more 
> antibiotic residue (and anti-biotic-resistant bacterial contamination) from 
> the milk (and meat) of treated cows.
> 
> It's been outlawed in Canada, the EU, and several other first-world 
> countries, mostly on animal welfare grounds. It remains legal in the US, but 
> most of the milk in my supermarket says "our farmers pledged not to use BST". 
>  Checking with wikipedia, this isn't just a yuppie phenomenon, a large number 
> of major brands of milk, including Costco's "Kirkland" brand, Walmart's 
> "Great Value" brand, and many more. 
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_somatotropin 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_somatotropin>
> 
> The wikipedia article doesn't have any recent data on how commonly it is 
> used, but says:
> 
> "From 2000-2005 the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) 
> survey of dairy producers found that about 17% of producers used rBST.[23] 
> The 2010 USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service survey of Wisconsin 
> farms found that about 18% of dairy farms used rBST.[24]"
> 
> So it's still out there, but most of our milk supply is from untreated cows.
> 
> ...
> 
> John, your first link in both intriguing and scary. 
> 
> 1.) I would be a lot more worried about this 
> http://www.the-open-mind.com/mit-estimates-half-of-all-children-autistic-in-10-years-due-to-monsanto-1/#fsWKjef2oeh3k4OW.01
>  ...
> Do you know anything about how reliable the author is? She uses a lot of 
> graphs of correlations, that I find very unconvincing. There are all manner 
> of things that correlate, and most of them aren't causal. Some are both 
> causally related to a third factor, and some are completely random. If you 
> want to see some fun, random correlations, check out this link.
> 
> http://www.tylervigen.com/
> 
> Ginda Fisher
> _______________________________________________
> apple-crop mailing list
> apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
> http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop

_______________________________________________
apple-crop mailing list
apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop

Reply via email to