I agree. This would be valuable work… Rong
From: <Scheffenegger>, Richard <r...@netapp.com<mailto:r...@netapp.com>> Date: Monday, November 4, 2013 5:48 PM To: Matt Mathis <mattmat...@google.com<mailto:mattmat...@google.com>>, Bob Briscoe <bob.bris...@bt.com<mailto:bob.bris...@bt.com>> Cc: "draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guideli...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guideli...@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guideli...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guideli...@tools.ietf.org>>, tsvwg IETF list <ts...@ietf.org<mailto:ts...@ietf.org>>, AQM IETF list <aqm@ietf.org<mailto:aqm@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols? (aqm chair hat off) I can fully support what Matt just stated! I have read an earlier version (-01 iirc), I’ll try to scan over this version in the coming days. Richard Scheffenegger From: aqm-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:aqm-boun...@ietf.org> [mailto:aqm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Matt Mathis Sent: Montag, 04. November 2013 15:17 To: Bob Briscoe Cc: draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guideli...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guideli...@tools.ietf.org>; tsvwg IETF list; AQM IETF list Subject: Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols? I think this is valuable work. Having a single document that describes the requirements and general principles will save future tunnel inventor/implementers from rediscovering the same bugs Thanks, --MM-- The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Alan Kay Privacy matters! We know from recent events that people are using our services to speak in defiance of unjust governments. We treat privacy and security as matters of life and death, because for some users, they are. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Bob Briscoe <bob.bris...@bt.com<mailto:bob.bris...@bt.com>> wrote: Folks, Pls respond if you support this being adopted as a work-group item in the IETF transport services w-g (tsvwg). The WG chairs need visibility of interest. Even better, if you're willing to read / comment / review / implement Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines> Abstract The purpose of this document is to guide the design of congestion notification in any lower layer or tunnelling protocol that encapsulates IP. The aim is for explicit congestion signals to propagate consistently from lower layer protocols into IP. Then the IP internetwork layer can act as a portability layer to carry congestion notification from non-IP-aware congested nodes up to the transport layer (L4). Following these guidelines should assure interworking between new lower layer congestion notification mechanisms, whether specified by the IETF or other standards bodies. [Cross-posting tsvwg & aqm, just in case] Bob Briscoe, also for co-authors Pat Thaler and John Kaippallimalil ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, BT _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org<mailto:aqm@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
