I'll have a look and see if I can contribute. --dave
On 01/08/2014 03:06 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > I have a doc shepard/researcher working with me to nail down cites > from the 70s and 80s. First up however was finding direct web > references to everything cited in the existing drafts. > > Alaric found links to everything missing and modified the existing > drafts to suit. I don't know how the various authors would like the > changes (?) - diffs can be had from the bufferbloat-rfcs repository in > github: > https://github.com/dtaht/bufferbloat-rfcs - there were only about 10 > URLs added. > > Still struggling with xml2rfc and pandoc2rfc here... > > On Jan 8, 2014 2:46 PM, "Wesley Eddy" <w...@mti-systems.com > <mailto:w...@mti-systems.com>> wrote: > > Hi, as we've entered 2014 and have charter milestones that we're > working towards, Richard and I thought it would be good to start > periodically sending a "status report" to the WG mailing list so > that we can all keep up with what's going on, and focus our efforts > together on the things that need work. > > Towards that goal, here is a snapshot of where we think the AQM > working group is at today, and what the next steps are that people > can contribute to: > > > - WG Milestones: > - Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC > 2309 (Goal: January 2014) > - draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation is accepted towards this milestone > - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/ > - the draft needs to be updated per comments received, including > feedback on the recommendations from the Vancouver meeting > - if the authors are comfortable, a WGLC might be made on the next > revision > - we would like to hear from other authors of RFC 2309 on this > document, if anyone has contacts to them. > > - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication > as Informational (Goal: July 2014) > - We need an editor team to step forward and begin work on this; > there was initial work presented in Vancouver, but no draft > available or > adopted by the working group yet. > - It will be difficult to make this milestone, and will push other > milestones back, if this work isn't accelerated. > - Please express interest to the chairs or on-list > > - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as > Proposed Standard (Goal: December 2014) > - Since any Proposed Standard algorithm should be in line with the > recommendations and be passable versus the evaluation guidelines, this > milestone is hard to start on without significant progress on the > previous two. > - Currently the only algorithm spec with a complete and active > individual-submission draft is PIE > > - Other items: > - draft-pan-aqm-pie is under active work as a proposed algorithm: > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00.txt > - CoDel draft is expired; Dave Taht or others may revive it and/or > describe pairing with FQ/SFQ algorithms: > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-01.txt > - Other algorithm specifications are welcome! > - Though, we are not planning on adopting algorithms until > recommendations and evaluation guidelines are mostly stable > > > -- > Wes Eddy > MTI Systems > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org <mailto:aqm@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > > > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest dav...@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain (416) 223-8968
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
