All, CoDel's issues with high load have also been measured in [1].
Cheers, Nicolas [1] Jarvinen, I.; Kojo, M., "Evaluating CoDel, PIE, and HRED AQM techniques with load transients," in Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2014 IEEE 39th Conference on , vol., no., pp.159-167, 8-11 Sept. 2014. doi: 10.1109/LCN.2014.6925768 URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6925768&isnumber=6925725 -----Message d'origine----- De : aqm [mailto:aqm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Bob Briscoe Envoyé : mercredi 30 septembre 2015 15:00 À : Polina Goltsman Cc : AQM IETF list Objet : Re: [aqm] CoDel's control law that determines drop frequency Polina, I think this was it: <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-iccrg-2.pdf> I have a set of charts from Rong with many more tests showing CoDel's sluggish responsiveness, but I believe the above was the published summary. Bob On 30/09/15 10:13, Polina Goltsman wrote: > Dear Bob, > > On 09/30/2015 10:50 AM, Bob Briscoe wrote: >> >> Early on, Rong Pan showed that it takes CoDel ages to bring high load >> under control. I think this linear increase is the reason. > > Is there a link to this ? > > Polina > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm -- ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/ _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
