> On 15 Oct, 2015, at 18:08, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
> 
> Small packets shouldn't be supressed just because they are small... no ssh 
> connections would work.

Of course not, that would be stupid.

But some network nodes do *prioritise* packets based solely on size, since (as 
a heuristic) latency-sensitive packets do tend to be small.  That’s what I was 
pointing out.

 - Jonathan Morton

_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Reply via email to