> On Mar 2, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Alan Jenkins > <alan.christopher.jenk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Google avoid the bursts you describe, using pacing.
I have been an advocate of pacing during the first transmission burst (including after an idle period) for quite some time, and also for delay-based algorithms. There would be no need for AQM if TCPs would maximize throughput while at the same time minimizing mean end to end delay, which is a matter of choosing for cwnd the largest value that maintains the smallest current RTT. Those Google folk are pretty smart.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
