The guy uses Eudora which has AFAIK some filtering capabilities. Can't
tell anything about the format of the filtering rules as I don't use
Eudora.

He wrote the message in reply to one of mine, but simply changed the
subject. Was this the reason which determined you to send this posting? :) 

On the other hand I use qmail here at work, but I haven't yet "researched"
its mail-filtering capabilities. I was more interested in masquerading, in 
 in order to use my personal e-mail adress at work, too (kind of like
spammers, but I don't spam anyone AFAIK :)))).   

At home I dropped any kind of sendmail or
qmail in favour of XFmail 1.5.0 which is a standalone e-mail program,
better suited  for dial-up. XFmail has also pretty nice capabilities to
filter e-mail.

C.B.

On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Steve wrote:

> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 09:10:11 -0500 (EST)
> From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: can't leave this *(&^&% list
> 
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, anarkissed wrote:
> 
> > No matter what I do it won't go away.  I can't filter it to trash, somehow 
> > every filter I create is bypassed and trust me, I've created a LOT covering 
> > every damn variation I could think of short of filtering the members of the 
> > list as well.
> 
>   If you do this in procmail, you'll never see an arachne 
> mail again.
> 
> :0 :
> * ^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /dev/null
> 
> -- 
> Steve Ackman
> http://twoloonscoffee.com     (Need green beans?)
> http://twovoyagers.com                (glass, linux & other stuff)
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to