Derek Cicero wrote: > Richard Lowe wrote: > > John Plocher wrote: [snip] > > I'd like to hear more of the rational behind this. I can't see > > anything immediately wrong with expecting people involved in such > > discussions to have opensolaris.org accounts. Though requiring > > subscription to the various specific aliases is not good, I agree. > > > > There's already the "Let any opensolaris.org member post to any list > > without moderation" request(s). Why would these, if implemented, not > > meet your needs? > > I am reading John's email as saying that the existing RFE has now > reached a point where it needs to be addressesd ASAP in order for him > continue. > > Is that right?
No rushing, please. I am back from my vacation and passing all valid email (including the ARC - actually everying except emails like "... enlarge your brain size..." etc. :-) ) in the ksh93-integration mailman approval queue through. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
