On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:56:20 -0500 "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Anyway, what about our iso release? tpowa didn't want to have > > libtool moved before the release. Because I don't expect another > > new ISO based on his work in the next days I want to push libtool > > and related packages to core/extra. I know not all devs have > > checked their packages for rebuilds or just not replied. All known > > libtool issues have been fixed. I expect more from hidden depends > > after a move to core but that wouldn't change if we keep libtool > > longer in testing. > > > > opinions? can i get signoffs for libtool 2.2-2? > > This sounds acceptable to me. If all the major libtool related issues > have been run into, then I'm cool with it. > > I will give you a signoff tonight when I make sure I'm fully up to > date and everything is running fine. > > Anyone else? Signoff from me, see no problems on my programs here. Maybe we find some more issues after the moving...but I think the most dependencies are rebuilt.