Aaron Griffin wrote:
One of the things I was thinking about, because sometimes signoffs can
stagnate....
Should we have a time-based limit?
That is, if a package has been in testing for X days, with no
complaints, but no signoffs, yet, can we consider it fully functional,
assuming the packager is comfortable with that.
I'd like opinions on this. I'm trying to solve the issue of the big
ol' backlog of pending-signoff packages.
I quite like this idea. A "no bug report after given period of time =
no problems" strategy should work as the community can do a lot more
testing in total than we can.
Allan
