On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 08:02 -0400, Paul Mattal wrote: > > It's not necessarily a bad thing to have the signoffs come from testers > who are not developers-- it saves time for developers to be developing > if others are testing. > > I know I test when I can, but usually get around to it less when I have > a backlog of developing to do already. > > So it might be a better division of labor to bring actual testers on > board who like testing and who help us out by doing that. With the web > interface, we should be able to give them just access to signoffs. > > Just a thought. > > - P +1, Agree.
- [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addendum Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addendum Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addendum Eduardo Romero
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addendum Dusty Phillips
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addendum Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addend... Paul Mattal
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff ad... Eduardo Romero
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signo... Thayer Williams
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible s... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible s... Dan McGee
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible s... Thomas Bächler
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addend... Dusty Phillips
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff ad... Eric Belanger

