On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/28 Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> 2008/9/4 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Eduardo Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 14:57 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: >>>>> I have disabled all line wrapping to prevent broken config files like >>>>> this: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11290 >>>>> >>>>> -Please signoff (also ncurses related) >>>>> >>>>> -Andy >>>> Just a thought, and I hope is not too late. Wouldn't it be better to >>>> make the installer use 'nano -w' instead of just 'nano'? We have just >>>> removed a functionality from the nano package by disabling line wrapping >>>> from the package itself. Also, I'm having a hard time getting used to >>>> not type, 'nano -w' when I want to edit a file, that command just >>>> doesn't work anymore. >>> >>> I apparently had line wrapping turned on in my /etc/nanorc too that >>> yelled at me. I kinda agree with Eduardo here. Maybe we should >>> re-enable this. >> >> There's a bug about missing -w in installer: >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11468 >> So should we add -w to installer and re-enable word-wrapping in nano, >> or should I close this bugreport as "Fixed" now? > > I've just closed it as a duplicate of http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11290 > but still the proper fix would be to use nano -w in installer > instead of disabling -w in nano, IMO.
Or maybe we should use "wrap" in the default nanorc?
