Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/9/28 Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/9/4 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Eduardo Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 14:57 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
I have disabled all line wrapping to prevent broken config files like
this: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11290
-Please signoff (also ncurses related)
-Andy
Just a thought, and I hope is not too late. Wouldn't it be better to
make the installer use 'nano -w' instead of just 'nano'? We have just
removed a functionality from the nano package by disabling line wrapping
from the package itself. Also, I'm having a hard time getting used to
not type, 'nano -w' when I want to edit a file, that command just
doesn't work anymore.
I apparently had line wrapping turned on in my /etc/nanorc too that
yelled at me. I kinda agree with Eduardo here. Maybe we should
re-enable this.
There's a bug about missing -w in installer:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11468
So should we add -w to installer and re-enable word-wrapping in nano,
or should I close this bugreport as "Fixed" now?
I've just closed it as a duplicate of http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11290
but still the proper fix would be to use nano -w in installer
instead of disabling -w in nano, IMO.
Or maybe we should use "wrap" in the default nanorc?
OK with me.
