On mar., 2016-07-05 at 20:33 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2016-07-04 22:07, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > > On ven., 2016-07-01 at 17:43 -1000, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > > > [2016-07-01 21:24:47 +0200] Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public: > > > > Am 2016-06-30 09:41, schrieb Johannes Löthberg via arch-dev-public: > > > > > That has actually come up on IRC a lot of times over the last couple > > > > > years, users asking how to sign-off packages / if they can help > > > > > signing-off. > > > > > > > > I've already got 4 people willing to help, but nobody here voiced an > > > > opinion > > > > on this matter yet. Do we want such tester from a dev/TU perspective? > > > > > > That sounds like the best idea so far. It also gives users running > > > [testing] some kind of a purpose besides the fun of the occasional > > > breakage. > > > > > > > I think we should not promote person as developer because their main work > > is to > > test packages. This seems more "support staff" position. > > > > If we want to keep the explicit feedback, we could also open signoffs to > > our > > community. The feedbacks will be more representative as only few selected > > people will test their own needs. > > > > Cheers, > > > > No one said anything about promoting such users to developers. That > would be new role just with signoffs permissions. > Ok. I misunderstood the "Do we want such tester from a dev/TU perspective?"
Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part