On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 05:55 +0200, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 01:07:12PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 2/6/19 9:08 am, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > 1. Simplified repositories > > > Currently we have [core], [extra] and [community]. These > > > threerepositories are there, because they have grown to this structure > > > overtime. At the moment I don't see any real meaning for the split of > > > [core]and [extra]. So one suggestion would be to either: - merge [extra] > > > and [core] > > > > I stopped reading here. If you don't understand the difference > > between[core] and [extra], you should ask. Particularly before proposing > > theremoval of [core]. > > Allan > > Hi Allan,I didn't propose the removal of [core], I proposed a discussion > aroundthe current repository and organisation structure. Merging [core] > and[extra] is just one of many ideas. If you have something to say, pleasedo > so and don't keep your secret. I would be glad if you could share it. > chris
Hello, [core] packages must land in [testing] and receive signoffs before reaching [core].In other words, packages in [core] must receive positive feedback before a wider diffusion.This introduce a latency to lower the risk of base components breaking. So, before merging [core] and [extra] we should have a way to flag packages which requires signoffs. Secretly, Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
