On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 00:15 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 29 November 2010 00:08, Yaro Kasear <y...@marupa.net> wrote: > > Once again, I say PA is far from the kind of quality I'd expect from a > > package in [extra], and I'm surprised the Arch devs are even considering > > it, especially in light of the fact that there's far more stable and > > useful packages in [community] getting passed up. > > Once again, nobody asked for opinions on PulseAudio, the software. If > it does affect you directly, do report that here or the bugtracker. It > was moved to [extra] for package-specific reasons, not just on a whim > as you would like to think.
What packages actually REQUIRE Pulse Audio? I don't know of a single Linux app to date that actually NEEDS it over what already exists in ALSA itself.
