dmb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 06/26/2011 04:53 PM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
>>     What does "route" say in this case? I had a similar problem with
>> the update which was due to the gateway being ignored. At that point
>> I switched to netcfg which worked fine...
>>
>>         Jerome
> 
> Looks fine to me. Same output as I get on my laptop.
> 
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0         192.168.0.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
> eth0
> 192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
> eth0
> 
        Not the same issue then, I did not have the first line... Switching
to netcfg might still be an option however.

                Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to