Lighter on resources, easily configurable. On 12/27/2015 05:43 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
Just a call for opinions: if you use Arch, and you wanted to choose and stay with a desktop environment long-term, what would you choose - and why?
Xfce. Simplistic, slow dev cycle, dev's pay attention to the desktop
rather than chase the new 'tablet-like'.
- [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop en... Francis Gerund
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof d... Ivan
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof d... Marshall Neill
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof d... Serge Hooge
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-pro... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future... Serge Hooge
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof d... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-pro... Sean Greenslade
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most fu... Sean Greenslade
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof d... D C
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-pro... Storm Dragon
- Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future... m.celiesius
