On 09/01/11 16:36, Peter Simons wrote: > Hi Magnus, > > I have the impression that you are avoiding the substance of my original > article in this thread. I posted that very long and very detailed message, > because I believe that it's vital to understand the problems we have to > solve before we try to solve them. I would love to hear your opinion about > the issues I raised in a little more detail than "this sort of feedback is > invaluable." If you feel that my feedback is invaluable, then please respond > it instead of re-starting this thread from scratch, ignoring everything I > already wrote.
I was probably too vague, because I was waiting for you to provide more information. In your initial email you say things are broken, but in my opinion you don't provide enough information for me to understand WHY you say that. I've replied to your initial email with some comments that you hopefully find more concrete. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
