arch-haskell  

Messages by Thread

• [arch-haskell] Call for someone to take over ArchHaskell! Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Call for someone to take over ArchHaskell! Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Call for someone to take over ArchHaskell! Dawid Loubser
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Call for someone to take over ArchHaskell! David Nicholaeff
• [arch-haskell] The machine hosting the repo is being retired João Miguel
• [arch-haskell] The machine hosting the repo is being retired Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] The machine hosting the repo is being retired Dawid Loubser
  • Re: [arch-haskell] The machine hosting the repo is being retired Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Problem installing Wink Saville
• [arch-haskell] To xmonad users: any dynamic/static issues in our repo? Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] To xmonad users: any dynamic/static issues in our repo? Wade Duvall
• [arch-haskell] Pull request to HABS João Miguel
• [arch-haskell] Ghc 8.2.1 Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 8.2.1 Dawid Loubser
• [arch-haskell] i686 disappearing Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] i686 disappearing Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose? Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose? Johan Holmquist
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose? Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Another rebuild Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Another rebuild Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Another rebuild Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Anyone up for developing a Hackage extension for Pacboy based on cblrepo? Xyne
• [arch-haskell] PKGBUILDs for multiple coexisting versions of GHC Rudy Matela
• [arch-haskell] Ghc 8.0.1 in testing Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Broken box after latest ghc update Pierre Radermecker
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Broken box after latest ghc update Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Broken box after latest ghc update Pierre Radermecker
• [arch-haskell] Repos temporarily down Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Repos temporarily down Barry Fishman
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Repos temporarily down Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Repos temporarily down Sergey Khorev
• [arch-haskell] xsounds is down Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] xsounds is down Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] xsounds is down fox
  • Re: [arch-haskell] xsounds is down Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] xsounds is down tam
  • Re: [arch-haskell] xsounds is down SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] xsounds is down Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Split packages for a few tools Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] ghc-vis stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis Barry Fishman
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-vis Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? Leif Warner
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? Leif Warner
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? Leif Warner
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? stef204
• [arch-haskell] HsQML, can we have it? SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] HsQML, can we have it? Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] HsQML, can we have it? Marcin Mrotek
• [arch-haskell] haskell on armv7 Ben Burdette
• [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10.2? Bardur Arantsson
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10.2? Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10.2? Bjørn Øivind Bjørnsen
• [arch-haskell] Links from /usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/index.html not referring to packages Leif Warner
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Links from /usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/index.html not referring to packages Skottish
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Links from /usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/index.html not referring to packages Leif Warner
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Links from /usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/index.html not referring to packages Nicola Squartini
• [arch-haskell] Best way to workaround haskell-nats blocking upgrade? Bastien Traverse
• [arch-haskell] pacman output for archhaskell packages Ramana Kumar
  • Re: [arch-haskell] pacman output for archhaskell packages Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] pacman output for archhaskell packages Ramana Kumar
  • Re: [arch-haskell] pacman output for archhaskell packages Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Kiwilight is going away, thank you Kaiting Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] gitit status update: feed fixed and uploaded, possibility of reincluding gitit? Bastien Traverse
  • Re: [arch-haskell] gitit status update: feed fixed and uploaded, possibility of reincluding gitit? Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] gitit status update: feed fixed and uploaded, possibility of reincluding gitit? Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] gitit status update: feed fixed and uploaded, possibility of reincluding gitit? Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] gitit status update: feed fixed and uploaded, possibility of reincluding gitit? Bastien Traverse
• [arch-haskell] ghc-mod in repo Данила Рязановский
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-mod in repo Pierre Radermecker
  • Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-mod in repo Bjørn Øivind Bjørnsen
• [arch-haskell] For the brave: alternative versioning in testing repo Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] For the brave: alternative versioning in testing repo Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] For the brave: alternative versioning in testing repo Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] For the brave: alternative versioning in testing repo Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] For the brave: alternative versioning in testing repo Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] For the brave: alternative versioning in testing repo Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] For the brave: alternative versioning in testing repo Nicola Squartini
• [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Xyne
  • Re: [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Fabien Dubosson
  • Re: [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Fabien Dubosson
  • Re: [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Xyne
  • Re: [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Fabien Dubosson
  • Re: [arch-haskell] RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages SP
  • [arch-haskell] Fwd: RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: RFQ: Proposal for new versioning of packages Nicola Squartini
• [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Skottish
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Cblrepo and dependencies Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Bastien Traverse
  • [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Bastien Traverse
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Leif Warner
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Bastien Traverse
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Bastien Traverse
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Fabien Dubosson
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries Fabien Dubosson
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Fwd: gitit status update and why are deps needed for binaries SP
• [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? Skottish
  • Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? Skottish
  • Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? Skottish
  • Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? Skottish
  • Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-xml-conduit-1.2.3.3-78 invalid package? SP
• [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc H. Curry
• [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Dawid Loubser
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Skottish
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Dawid Loubser
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Dawid Loubser
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Dawid Loubser
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Xyne
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10, and popular packages like Pandoc Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo Magnus Therning
  • [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Xyne
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Skottish
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Nicola Squartini
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] Ghc 7.10.1 in repo [was: Re: Ghc 7.10.1 in testing repo] Magnus Therning
• [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10 rc3 Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10 rc3 Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10 rc3 SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10 rc3 Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] GHC 7.10 rc3 SP
• [arch-haskell] repo's offline? stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? Pierre Radermecker
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? Pierre Radermecker
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? stef204
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? SP
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? Magnus Therning
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? tam
  • Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline? Magnus Therning

• Earlier messages