On 02/02/11 22:57, Peter Hercek wrote: > On 02/02/2011 11:26 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: >> >>> A way to mitigate this would be to either keep at kill list of files >>> to remove and when and/or having a separate repo for these archives. >> Are there any tools that would make it easier to maintain such a kill >> list? > > How about keeping the last two versions all the time. No need to > have a kill list. And the repository is fairly small. It should not > be a problem if it takes two times the size.
AFAICS repo-clean can't be used then; it always keeps only the very latest version of a package. Is there some other tool that is more configurable that can be used to automate such a policy? /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
