On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Ethan Schoonover <e...@ethanschoonover.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Magnus Therning <mag...@therning.org> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 06:11:31PM +0100, Fabio Riga wrote: >> > Sorry. We have to wait pandoc update: >> > >> > Failed to satisfy the following dependencies for hakyll: >> > pandoc >=1.10 && <1.11 >> > >> > Magnus, is there a reason to not update pandoc? >> >> Yeah, graphalyze is holding it back. I attempted a simple bump in the >> cabal file, but the compile failed so I'm waiting for upstream to fix >> it. Maybe it's time to send a friendly request. > > > Magnus, I'd appreciate that. Moving to Hakyll 4.0 is a must do for me and > I'd prefer to stay on the haskell repos if possible. Please let me know if I > can assist in any way in lobbying for graphalyze to update it's > dependencies.
I've sent a question to the maintainer of Graphalyze if he's already working on a version that works with the latest pandoc. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
