On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:32:25PM +0100, Fabien Dubosson wrote: > > Would you verify that passing --ghc-options when configuring a package > > adds the options to 'ghc-options:' if present in the .cabal file? > > With pleasure. I made a «dummy» program to verify that (files here > [1]): > > 1. A dummy `Main.hs` executable which uses an external library and > also generates GHC warnings. > 2. A simple `test-ghc-opts.cabal` file which has a `ghc-options:` > to display warnings > 3. A `build.sh` script which configures the program with a > `ghc-options` to remove the [rpath] of dynamic linking. > > If both the warnings are displayed and the [rpath] doesn't exist, it > means that both ways of giving `ghc-options` are working side by > side. It is the case on my computer! But I let you verify my scripts > to be sure that I'm doing the test correctly. > > [1] https://gist.github.com/StreakyCobra/0067d15fd74ebf8bf5e0
Excellent, then that is indeed a better route than the one I embarked on. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus But whereas I previously held for Java a cordial dislike borne of having only a cursory notion of how it worked, now my dislike for the language can no longer be called at all "cordial", for familiarity has bred contempt. -- tom Christiansen
pgpHaHHq8mfot.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
