I think it's unnecessary (and even annoying for many users) to have all packages that contains binaries split. Beside it requires modifying cblrepo. Unless the demand increases, I would suggest to simply manually split (via *.pkgbuild patches) only explicitly requested packages, like pandoc and gitit.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Magnus Therning <mag...@therning.org> wrote: > On 15 April 2015 at 08:40, Bastien Traverse <neit...@esrevart.net> wrote: > > Le 14/04/2015 16:12, Magnus Therning a écrit : > >> IIRC, the regular installation doesn't support it (i.e. via Cabal). > >> What we need is specific recipes to package tools and lib parts into > >> separate packages, i.e. a split package. > > > > Le 14/04/2015 23:29, Magnus Therning a écrit : > >> Just playing around a little with one of the packages currently in > >> the repo comprising both a lib and a binary resulted in the attached > >> PKGBUILD (shake). It might be close to what a solution could look > >> like. > > > > Thanks for having a try at this, it looks good! Have you tested it or > > you wish for somebody to try it out? > > I have not tested it, and there might be quite a bit of testing > necessary I'm afraid. > > /M > > -- > Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 > email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org > twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus > _______________________________________________ > arch-haskell mailing list > arch-haskell@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell >
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
