On 5/6/05, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe ArchLinux could switch to initng for 0.8, or when kernel 2.8 comes > out (I can imagine there will be alot of package-fixing for initng and > work to port the current scripts to the initng structure)
I'm going to make a package for initng, for all the people requesting it. However, I don't know why everyone is suggesting switching Arch as a whole. This is new, and not heavilly tested. Just because it is reported as faster, doesn't make it a better choice. The key factor being that you shouldn't reboot your box enough for this to matter... my laptop has an average uptime of 15 days before a reboot. Saving 20 seconds every 15 days is not worth a switch to something that is untested and technically a beta. That said, in the near future I will provide a package for it, but missing initscripts will be up to the user. I seriously doubt Arch will change because something was slashdotted. Aaron Griffin <phrakture> _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
