As James already said, probably not. However, we are currently discussing the possibility of adding more SCSI modules into the current archck config so i would appreciate input on that from anyone with experience in these realms. While I can build and pkg a kernel I'm a bit clueless about how the whole things works so "expert" opnion on this matter would be warmly welcomed.
I'm currently research the initrd/fbsplash issue and if I can find a solution then that path will be open to us :) Phil Joe Giles wrote: >James Rayner wrote: > > > >>ArchCK is a derivation of the CK patchset that is taking a similar >>path to the old CKO patchset. It aims to include a variety of popular >>features and updates that have not currently made it to the vanilla >>kernel without compromising stability. Con Kolivas' CK patchset is the >>core of ArchCK and wouldnt exist without it (thanks Con). >> >>Apply this patch to 2.6.14. It includes 2.6.14.1. >> >>Patch (Apply patch to 2.6.14): >>http://iphitus.loudas.com/arch/ck/2.6.14/patch-2.6.14-archck4.bz2 >> >>Broken out: >>http://iphitus.loudas.com/arch/ck/2.6.14/2.6.14-archck4-broken-out.tar.bz2 >> >>Website: >>http://iphitus.loudas.com/archck.php >> >>Changelog: >>updated ck to 2.6.14-ck4 >>updated suspend2 to 2.2-rc9 >>added hz extra values patch >>added fix for ipw2x00 with a hz lower than 100 >> >>Full Changelog available on website. >> >>Errata: >>Reiser4: Debug mode must be off. >>hz extra values: If you choose a value other than 100, or 1000 and >>have problems, chances are that is what is causing those issues. If >>you are unsure, select 1000. >> >>Included: >>CK Patchset >>fbsplash >>vesafb-tng >>reiser4 >>shfs >>Squashfs >>UnionFS >>Suspend2 >>Custom dsdt >> >>Ebuilds: >>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103354 >> >>Arch Users: >>This will be in the community repo in a few days. >> >>-- >>iphitus - archck maintainer >>Home:iphitus.loudas.com Blog: iphitus.blogspot.com >> >>_______________________________________________ >>arch mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >> >> >> >> >> >James, > >Is this release, and subsequent releases going to use the initrd path >that the testing Arch kernel is using? > >Just curious... > >Thanks!!! > >Joe > >_______________________________________________ >arch mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
